• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Vimeo
  • FCUS Courses
  • Register for FCUS Course
  • Login
Intensive Care Network
  • About Us
    • What is ICN
    • Our Team
  • Events
  • Podcast Series
    • Podcast by Topic
      • Airway Podcasts
      • Cardiac Podcasts
      • Career Podcasts
      • Conference Podcasts
      • Education Podcasts
      • Evidence Podcasts
      • GI/Renal Podcasts
      • Haem Podcasts
      • Metabolic Podcasts
      • Miscellaneous Podcasts
      • Neuro Podcasts
      • Paeds Podcasts
      • Respiratory Podcasts
      • Resuscitation Podcasts
      • Sepsis Podcasts
      • Toxicology Podcasts
      • Trauma Podcasts
      • Ultrasound Podcasts
    • Podcast by Specialty
      • Anaesthetics
      • Emergency
      • ICU
      • Prehospital
    • SMACC
    • ICN
    • Jellybean
    • CICM ASM
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Clinical Cases
    • Fav Posts/Other Sources
    • Game Changing Evidence
    • Radiology
      • ICU Radiology
    • Simulation Resources
    • Ultrasound
      • Lung Ultrasound
  • EXAMHELP
    • ANAESTHETICS PRIMARY
    • ANZCA FELLOWSHIP
    • CICM Fellowship
    • EMERGENCY PRIMARY
    • ICU Primary Exam
    • PAEDS FELLOWSHIP
  • Contact Us

RCTs are the Basis of Good Clinical Practice – CON: Peter Brindley, PRO: John Myburgh

Home RCTs are the Basis of Good Clinical Practice – CON: Peter Brindley, PRO: John Myburgh
Myburgh Brindley - RCT's are the basis of good clinical practice

Peter Brindley
This speaker is pretty certain he is going to lose…but he’s going to go down fighting. He will argue against the mighty Dr John Myberg (whom, incidentally, he admires mightily). RCTs do certainly matter, but clinical judgment and prompt bedside attention matters far more. Moreover, RCTs so often fail to address the questions that really matter. RCTs also commonly fail to improve quality, effectiveness, safety, and reliability in modern complex acute medical care. A vote against the blinkered focus on RCTs is a vote for better (not biased) patient care. Myberg and his myopics must be defeated…come join me!

John Myburgh
Medicine is a complex craft. Acute medicine is more complex. Excellence is delivering effective acute care depends on recognising the broad base of basic sciences, clinical experience, and results of clinical trials. Central to all decisions has to be how these will benefit the patient – both in the short term as well and longer term so that survivors of acute illness are left with the best possible outcome for that patient, their caregivers and the community at large. This is a daunting concept under time-limited, information-limited conditions. Clinicians are often left with uncertainty about the impact of decisions and rely on short-term surrogate measurements to justify treatment options. Consequently, assessing outcomes are invariably confounded by associations that bear little relationship to causation or biological plausibility. Such confounders are often demonstrated in observational studies and RCTs with low levels of internal validity, particularly those conducted in single centres and/or driven by protagonists of a particular intervention. Carefully conducted RCTs with high levels of internal validity – those that produce believable results from rigorous study design and those that produce results that are generalisble to specific patient populations remain the only way to mitigate bias and produce clinically-relevant answers to improve patient-centred outcomes. Critical Care Medicine leads the way in producing high-fidelity RCTs that have fundamentally changed clinical practice, not only in terms of producing better patient-centred outcomes, but also by producing unequivocal evidence to stop or avoid using of previously harmful treatments that had been enthusiastically embraced by clinicians and guideline developers. Such examples of benefit include the CRASH-2 and ARDS-net trials, and of preventing harm, the SAFE, NICE-SUGAR, RENAL, CHEST, DECRA and FEAST studies among others. The net impact of these pivotal trials has been the prevention of millions of deaths and the saving of millions of dollars. Such is the basis of GOOD clinical practice and these trials must be seen as a source of knowledge, science and pride … that ultimately improve patient outcomes.

the podcast

the slides

RCTs are the Basis of Good Clinical Practice - CON from Royal North Shore Hospital & UTS

Subscribe to the ICN Podcast

Subscribe to the SMACC Podcast

Share this
SMACC Force Rant: Is it the Skillset or Background that Count?DNR Should Be The Default - PRO: Alex Psirides, CON: Sara Gray
IPSN – Intensivist Parent Support Network WIN – Women in Intensive Care Network ICN UK ICN NZ ICN WA ICN VIC ICN NSW ICN QLD The ICN Story The Team Jellybean Podcasts ICN Blog SMACC Video SMACC Audio Video ECG Simulator by aclsmedicaltraining BASIC SCIENCE CLINIC Simulation Game Changing Evidence ICU Radiology Echo Guide ECHO Cases Clinical Cases EXAMHELP Jellybean Podcasts ICN Blog SMACC Video SMACC Audio Video CICM Fellowship ANZCA FELLOWSHIP PAEDS FELLOWSHIP EMERGENCY PRIMARY ANAESTHETICS PRIMARY End-o-bed-o-gram

  • About
    •  What is ICN
    •  The Team
    •  ICN NSW
    •  ICN QLD
    •  ICN VIC
    •  ICN WA
    •  ICN NZ
    •  ICN UK
  • Resources
    •  Lung US
    •  Exam Help
    •  Clinical Cases
    •  Echo Cases
    •  Echo Guide
    •  ICU Radiology
    •  Game Changing Evidence
    •  ICN Metafeed
    •  Simulation Resouces
  • Media
    •  SMACC Posters
    •  Audio
    •  Video
    •  Pecha Kuchas
  • Upskill
    •  Clinical Cases
    •  Echo Cases
    •  ICU Radiology
  • Exam Help
    •  End-o-Bed-o-Gram
    •  ICU Primary Exam
    •  CICM Fellowship
    •  ANZCA Fellowship
    •  Paeds Fellowship
    •  Emergency Primary
    •  Anaesthetics Primary

® 2021 The Intensive Care Network || All rights reserved || Disclaimer || Site Map || Contact ICN Support

Log in with your credentials

or     Create an account

Lost your password?

Forgot your details?

I remember my details

Create Account