• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Vimeo
  • FCUS Courses
  • Register for FCUS Course
  • Login
Intensive Care Network
  • About Us
    • What is the ICN?
    • The ICN Story
  • Events
  • Podcast Series
    • ICN Activities
      • ICN Hot cases
      • Semantic sMatter
      • ECG Proving Ground
      • Echo Cases
      • SMACC 2013
      • ICU Radiology Cases
      • Game Changing Evidence
  • Regional Networks
    • SIN
    • BIN
  • Exams
    • Primary ANZCA
      • Pharmacology
      • Physiology
    • Primary ACEM
      • Pharmacology
      • Physiology
      • Pathology
      • Anatomy
    • Fellowship CICM
      • Notes
      • Past Papers
    • Fellowship Paeds
      • Approaches to Questions
      • Clinical Exam
      • Core ICU
      • Clinical Governance
      • Medicine
      • Surgery
    • Fellowship ANZCA
      • Notes
      • Past Papers with Answers
  • Resources
    • Links
    • The ICN meta feed
    • Reviews
      • Courses
      • Conferences
      • Websites & Blogs
      • Books & Journals
    • Clinical Resources
      • Clinical Calculators
    • Non-clinical resources
      • Research
  • Discussion Forum
    • Main Page

Submassive PE should be thrombolysed – Pro: Anand Swaminathan Con: Iain Beardsell

Home Submassive PE should be thrombolysed – Pro: Anand Swaminathan Con: Iain Beardsell
Submassive PE should be thrombolysed

Anand Swaminathan
PE is a spectrum of disease and patients on different parts of the spectrum should be treated differently. Subsegmental PE may need no treatment at all whereas massive PE is unlikely to improve without lytics. Between these ends of the spectrum lies the submassive PE – hemodynamically stable but with signs of RV strain portending worse long-term functional outcomes for patients and possible early deterioration. These patients should all be considered for systemic thrombolysis to improve outcomes.

Iain Beardsell
Some of the most difficult topics in medicine attract considerable debate, The use of thrombolysis for submassive PE is one of these. In this “Con” argument I attempt to highlight some of the most pertinent evidence against the use of thrombolysis.

the podcast

the slides

Submassive PE should be thrombolysed - Pro: Anand Swaminathan Con: Iain Beardsell from SMACC Conference

the video

Submassive PE Should be Thrombolysed- PRO- Anand Swaminathan CON- Iain Beardsell from Social Media and Critical Care on Vimeo.

Subscribe to the ICN Podcast

Subscribe to the SMACC Podcast

Share this
Standards in HEMS. What standards?ICU year in review
IPSN – Intensivist Parent Support Network WIN – Women in Intensive Care Network ICN UK ICN NZ ICN WA ICN VIC ICN NSW ICN QLD The ICN Story The Team Jellybean Podcasts ICN Blog SMACC Video SMACC Audio Video ECG Simulator by aclsmedicaltraining BASIC SCIENCE CLINIC Simulation Game Changing Evidence ICU Radiology Echo Guide ECHO Cases Clinical Cases EXAMHELP Jellybean Podcasts ICN Blog SMACC Video SMACC Audio Video CICM Fellowship ANZCA FELLOWSHIP PAEDS FELLOWSHIP EMERGENCY PRIMARY ANAESTHETICS PRIMARY End-o-bed-o-gram

  • About
    •  What is ICN
    •  The Team
    •  ICN NSW
    •  ICN QLD
    •  ICN VIC
    •  ICN WA
    •  ICN NZ
    •  ICN UK
  • Resources
    •  Lung US
    •  Exam Help
    •  Clinical Cases
    •  Echo Cases
    •  Echo Guide
    •  ICU Radiology
    •  Game Changing Evidence
    •  ICN Metafeed
    •  Simulation Resouces
  • Media
    •  SMACC Posters
    •  Audio
    •  Video
    •  Pecha Kuchas
  • Upskill
    •  Clinical Cases
    •  Echo Cases
    •  ICU Radiology
  • Exam Help
    •  End-o-Bed-o-Gram
    •  ICU Primary Exam
    •  CICM Fellowship
    •  ANZCA Fellowship
    •  Paeds Fellowship
    •  Emergency Primary
    •  Anaesthetics Primary

® 2025 The Intensive Care Network || All rights reserved || Disclaimer || Site Map || Contact ICN Support

Log in with your credentials

or     Create an account

Lost your password?

Forgot your details?

I remember my details

Create Account